Tuesday, June 28, 2005

The Choose Your Own Adventure of our times

Is today the day?

Do they do it?

Do they pass it?

While Stephan Harper sits pretty with radically right wing mullahs, opposing those evil doing ho-mo-saxualles from getting married or even celebrating their sin in downtown Toronto parades, the rest of the Canada prepares to be remembered proudly and become a smile on the face of history as opposed to a shitstain on history's pimpled ass.

Today, the government of Canada is supposed to pass legislation making same sex marriage legal. Making it enshrined in our sacredest of sacred places - the law.

Will they do it? Will they manage to stand strong? Will they lead Canada to become one of only 3 nations in the WORLD to legalise same sex marriage (behind Belgium and the Netherlands)??

Or will they fall prey to the heterosexist charms of the big of nose and double of chin that is Stephan Harper?

Only time will tell.

Stay turned for further bulletins as events warrant.

Reuters,9AM
CBC, 9:30AM

Thursday, June 16, 2005

A Personal Opinion on Assata Shakur

That I was lucky enough to meet and converse with the intelligent, powerful, fierce and admirable Assata Shakur still sometimes blows my mind. I hope to spend time with her again in the future. In the meantime, in case you don't know who Assata is or what the eff is the big deal, here is a personal recollection by Mos Def.

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Micro soft on censorship?

In case you weren't already sick of the technology giant Microsoft and its King Grand Poobah-for-life Bill Gates, now you have an even better reason to banish the corporation to the depths of capitalist hell. Seems Microsoft corporation, in a joint partnership with a Chinese government agency, has made inroads into the communist fortress of production, launching a new Chinese language web portal. The portal will allow Chinese citizens to create their own web pages and even, gasp! blogs.

But Microsoft has decided, in signing the contract with the government funded Shanghai Alliance Investment, to cave to censorship pressures on the part of the Chinese government.

Now all blogs and websites which function through MSN Spaces, a programme offering free blog space and operating through the MSN China portal, will not appear online or publish if the messages therein contain certain prohibited words.

A sampling of those words being "democracy", "human rights", "demonstration" "democratic movement", "freedom" and "Taiwan Independence" as well as some profane or sexually explicit references. Should one attempt to use these or any other prohibited words on their blog post, a message will be generated telling the user, if she already didn't know, that such language is prohibited.

Microsoft's portal launched on May 26th and already 5 million new blogs have been created, albeit without reference to certain words which will go unmentioned, nudge nudge, wink wink.

Seems a share of the profits from an estimated 87 million Chinese web users was too much for philanthropist Bill Gates to pass up on.

Left turn ahead?

It seems very interesting that while we in the North (Canada, the US, a lot of Europe) make increasing moves towards the right, infusing (in the case of Canada) greater doses of capitalism into our psuedo-Socialist system, our cohorts to the South seem to push further and further left in their political ideals.

While our nine wise red-robed sages make the dangerous decision to strike down the ban on public healthcare and Stephan Harper practically ejaculates with glee, Latin American politics and populations appear to be realising the deadly effects privatisation can have on cities and citizens. In Bolivia (named, incidentally, after great liberation leader Simon Boilvar and location of the murder of Ernesto "Che" Guevara) president Carlos Mesa was forced to resign last week after 3 weeks of protests paralysed the capital city of La Paz and even resulted in the shut down of the cities airport.

Why all the fuss?

The protesters are demanding that the Bolivian government nationalise the energy sector, keeping the vast natural gas reserves in the hands of the people, as opposed to the clutches of the greedy multinats that already populate large parts of the country. In October if 1999 the Bolivian government passed a law allowing the privatisation of water reserves in the country, which saw prices of residential water supply rise 400%. Massive protests against the French owned company Suez Lyonnaise des Eaux and the resignation of then president Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada saw the mostly indigenous protesters in Bolivia achieve some measure of success. Now the radical indigenous residents of El Alto, a mountainous town just outside the captial city of La Paz are at it again, demanding nationalisation in another important sector.

No surprise, then, that US State department statements place the blame squarely on leftist Latino leader Hugo Chavez, climing that his involvment spells doom for Bolivia and "democracy" (read: capitalism) in the region. Reports have stated that the State department is willing to intervene should they see any attempts to dismantle "democracy" (read: free market capitalism) in Bolivia. Interesting to note on that point that as well as being Latin America;s poorest country, Bolivia is also the areas most corrupt. Governments have successively passed legislation and signed contracts (including present ones with foreign oil companies) without the support of Congress, let alone the Bolivian population. The question ought to be, how can one dismantle democracy where none exists?

While racism is rampant, to the point of many hotels and swimming pools not admitting entry to Indigenous persons, the US State department has stated that the problem in Bolivia is not a matter of foreign multinational corporations getting rich off of Bolivian natural resources, or of the massive racial divide and discrimination against the Indigenous majority in the colonised country, nor even the continued meddling of the International Monetary Fund (Bolivia was the testing ground for the IMF's new liberalisation "shock therapy" project in te mid eighties).

No.

The problem, according to US State Department reports, is a matter of poor policy surrounding private property rights.

Have you ever had one of those moments where you realise that the person you are talking to is just not on the same wavelength as you at all? Like you are both talking about two totally different things.

At any rate, this movement by Bolivias Inidgenous majority seems indicative of recent moves in Latin America - many nations in the region seem to be moving (back?) to some sort of socialist or leftist political standpoint. While we in the wealthy and consumer driven north make moves towards ever greater privatisation and erosion of the public system, Latin America drives forward into the leftist future on an almost yearly basis.

The story of the Bolivian Indigenous movement ought to be a motivating force for Canada's First Nations population as well.

In other news of interesting happenings to the South... The first Retiremoent home for elderly prostitutes is slated to open in a few short months in Mexico City.

Thursday, June 09, 2005

The TV Report, episode 1.

Last night saw another shining example of why the "left" is better than the "right", at least with regards to popular media. General Colin Powell appeared for his 15 minutes of fame on Jon Stewart's infamous late night "news" programme, The Daily Show.

Although Stewart's criticisms of the Bush administration (and on occasion of Powell himself) have been at times virulent (but nothing short of hilarious), Powell and Stewart were able to relate to each other with a level of respect altogether absent in Stewart's right winge contemporaries such as Ann Coulter and Bill O'Reilly.

The differences were profound, with Stewart asking difficult questions while never raising his voice. losing his temper or resorting to childish name-calling (O'Reilly's modus operandi). In turn, Powell came off as an intelligent, dignified man who (while choosing the wrong team to play ball with) was worthy of respect nonetheless. He still stood by his former administrations decision to go into Iraq, and admirably Stewart stood by his opposition to that decision all the while thanking Powell for making an appearance on his show. And the fact that Powell was appearing as a guest did not stop Stewart and Corddry from taking shots at the Bush-Blair love affair going on overseas, nor making jokes at the vast quantities of information Bush seems to have discovered regarding global warming in the last five years (uh, that'd be none).

Perhaps the most important guest Stewart has ever had, and certainly - by his own admission - probably the closest he will ever get to the Bush admin, and yet never once did we see displays of idiocy generally considered the exclusive domain of Fox.